Submissions & Reviewing
Preparing funding applications and conference submissions is a vital part of the computational science community’s workflow around knowledge exchange. These processes provide opportunities to showcase our work, learn from others, strengthen collaborations, and secure funding to continue doing the work we love.
Reviewing is essential to support these processes. By acting as a reviewer, you contribute to maintaining quality, fairness and integrity within the community. Reviewing also provides valuable insight into what makes a strong submission and can strengthen your own applications.
CAKE Review Committee
The CAKE Review Committee is responsible for providing fair, respectful and constructive reviews to ensure CAKE funds are allocated appropriately and transparently.
Interested in getting involved?
- Read our Terms of Reference here.
- Apply here.
What is included?
Resources that provide guidance on:
- Identifying and preparing funding applications
- Writing strong funding proposals
- Preparing conference abstracts and submissions
- Examples of successful submissions
- Best practice in peer review
- Guidance and documentation for the CAKE Review Committee
What is not included?
- Translating research for broader audiences. See Communications and Outreach.
- Building and sustaining collaborations, which often strengthen applications. See Collaborations and Community Building